Most Designers Cannot Define the Thing They Are Paid to Do
Creativity is central to design work, yet most designers cannot define it beyond 'thinking outside the box'. Here's what psychology actually says it is.
Last week I asked seven of my studio colleagues, a mix of seniors and juniors, one question.
"What is creativity?"
Every single one of them said some version of the same thing.
"Thinking outside the box."
That answer is not wrong. But it is the way someone describes a country they have never visited. You know it exists. You just do not know what it actually looks like on the inside.
If creativity is central to design work — and I believe it is — then not understanding it properly is a problem. Not a small one.
I thought I'd share a few insights from my psychology classes that can benefit both designers and non-designers, because creativity is not limited to design. Every area of life needs it.
Let us start with a real definition
Creativity, according to decades of psychological research, is not a mood or a personality trait. Creativity is said to be the most advanced goal-oriented thought process. One that aims to produce ideas that are both original and genuinely useful.
The keyword is both.
Original without useful is just random. Useful without originality is just competent execution. Creativity is the intersection of the two.
Creativity is not a moment. It is a sequence.
Graham Wallas mapped the creative process into four stages. He argued that more parts of the brain are involved in arriving at a genuinely original idea than most people think.
Here is how those stages actually work, in plain language.
Stage 1: Preparation
Ideas do not appear in an empty mind. Before your brain can produce something original, it needs raw material. You have to read, observe, ask questions, explore dead ends, get things wrong, and start again. This is the gathering phase. It is messy and often frustrating. Most people want to skip it. You cannot.
In design terms, this is research, discovery, competitive analysis, and user interviews. The quality of what you produce later is directly proportional to how seriously you take this stage.
Stage 2: Incubation
This is the part nobody teaches in a design course. After you have loaded your brain with information, you stop pushing. You let it rest. You go for a walk. You sleep on it. You work on something unrelated.
This feels unproductive. It is not. The brain continues working when you are not consciously directing it. Some of your most useful connections form during this stage precisely because you have stopped forcing them.
Stage 3: Illumination
This is the moment. The idea arrives. Not gradually. Not slowly. It surfaces from somewhere below conscious thought and becomes clear.
Most people think this is all there is to creativity. It is actually just one stage of four.
Every experienced designer has had this experience. The answer that came to them in the shower, on a commute, in the middle of dinner. That is not magic. That is illumination through incubation doing its work.
Stage 4: Verification
The idea is not finished when it arrives. It still has to be tested, refined, communicated, and packaged for the people who need to receive it. Wallas argued that some of the greatest ideas in history were lost not because they were bad, but because they were never properly expressed.
For designers, this is the part where you have to move from "I know what this should be" to "I can show you clearly why this is the right answer." Verification is where craft and communication meet.
The six things creativity actually requires
This is the part I find most useful, and most overlooked.
Sternberg and his colleague Lubart built what they called the Investment and Confluence Theory of creativity. The core idea is that creative people are those who are willing to pursue ideas that are underdeveloped, unpopular, or currently out of favour. Ideas with growth potential that nobody else wants yet. They push through early resistance. And then, when the idea has been proven, they move on to the next unpopular idea.
In other words, they buy low and sell high — but in the currency of ideas.
What makes this possible is not talent alone. Sternberg identified six resources that have to come together for creativity to actually function.
1. Intellectual ability — and this is three things, not one
There is a synthetic skill: the ability to see a problem from a new angle, to connect things that were not connected before.
There is an analytical skill: the ability to recognise which of your own ideas is worth pursuing and which is not.
And there is a practical skill: the ability to communicate your idea clearly enough that others understand it and believe in it.
Here is what Sternberg found: these three skills only work properly when they operate together. Synthetic skill without analytical skill gives you powerful but undisciplined thinking. Analytical skill alone produces ideas that never get scrutinised properly. Practical skill alone gets things accepted — not because the idea is good, but because the presentation was impressive.
Most designers I have seen over-index on one of these three and neglect the others.
2. Knowledge
You need enough domain knowledge to push past the surface. But too much knowledge makes you rigid. You start defending what you already know instead of questioning it. Creativity requires a specific kind of relationship with knowledge. Deep enough to build on, loose enough to challenge.
3. Style of thinking
Creative people tend to think legislatively. They make rules rather than follow them. They can zoom out to the whole system and zoom in to the specific detail — and they know when to do each.
4. Personality
Specifically: willingness to sit with uncertainty, willingness to take a considered risk, and the ability to hold your position when others push back — without being stubborn for its own sake. Creativity requires a tolerance for being misunderstood early.
5. Motivation
Innovative work is rarely produced by anybody unless they are passionate about what they are doing. Real creative output requires intrinsic motivation — working because the problem is important rather than because the payoff is excellent. You are capable of producing very competent work with both technical proficiency and external motivation. However, the work that transforms something typically originates from a deeper level.
6. Environment
Even if a person has all the internal factors of being creative, they require a favourable environment — one that is supportive and rewarding of creative ideas. Environments typically are not fully supportive of the use of one's creativity. The obstacles can be minor or major. The individual must decide how to respond.
Some people let unfavourable forces in the environment block their creative output. Others do not.
So what is creativity, actually?
It is a goal-directed thinking process that produces something original and useful. It has stages. It requires specific resources. It can be developed, measured, and supported — or blocked, suppressed, and wasted.
It is not a personality type. It is not a gift. It is a system.
The next time someone in your team says creativity is thinking outside the box, ask them which stage of the creative process they are in. Ask them whether they have given the problem enough incubation time. Ask them whether the environment they are working in is actually supporting original thinking — or just demanding it.
The answer will tell you more about where your work is stuck than any design retrospective will.
After reading this article, you may have one question: what about the left brain and right brain? Isn't the right brain responsible for creativity? I'll address that in the next article.
Share this article
Related Articles
The Rush to Lead: Why True Leadership Takes Time, Patience and Scars
Many early professionals want to become a lead within one or two years. Here's a straight-from-the-heart look at why that rush happens, what leadership really demands, and how to build the habits that make you a natural leader.
What a UX Designer Actually Does in a High-Maturity Organisation
In mature UX environments, the role shifts from educating about design to operating at strategic altitude.